David Gompel-高明波

On peut rire de tout mais pas avec tout le monde (Desproges)

499 notes

How We Will Read: Clay Shirky


This post is part of “How We Will Read,” an interview series exploring the future of books from the perspectives of publishers, writers, and intellectuals. Read our kickoff post with Steven Johnson here. And check out our new homepage, a captivating new way to explore Findings.

This week, we were extremely honored to speak to Internet intellectual Clay Shirky, writer, teacher, and consultant on the social and economic effects of Internet technologies. Clay is a professor at the renowned Interactive Telecommunications Program at NYU and author of two books, most recently Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age.

Clay is one of the foremost minds studying the evolution of Internet culture. He is also a dedicated writer and reader, and it was natural that we would ask him to contribute to our series to hear what he could teach us about social reading. Clay is both brilliant and witty, able to weave in quotes from Robert Frost in one breath and drop a “ZOMG” in the next. So sit down and take notes: Professor Shirky’s about to speak.

How is publishing changing?

Publishing is not evolving. Publishing is going away. Because the word “publishing” means a cadre of professionals who are taking on the incredible difficulty and complexity and expense of making something public. That’s not a job anymore. That’s a button. There’s a button that says “publish,” and when you press it, it’s done.

In ye olden times of 1997, it was difficult and expensive to make things public, and it was easy and cheap to keep things private. Privacy was the default setting. We had a class of people called publishers because it took special professional skill to make words and images visible to the public. Now it doesn’t take professional skills. It doesn’t take any skills. It takes a Wordpress install.

The question isn’t what happens to publishing — the entire category has been evacuated. The question is, what are the parent professions needed around writing? Publishing isn’t one of them. Editing, we need, desperately. Fact-checking, we need. For some kinds of long-form texts, we need designers. Will we have a movie-studio kind of setup, where you have one class of cinematographers over here and another class of art directors over there, and you hire them and put them together for different projects, or is all of that stuff going to be bundled under one roof? We don’t know yet. But the publishing apparatus is gone. Even if people want a physical artifact — pipe the PDF to a printing machine. We’ve already seen it happen with newspapers and the printer. It is now, or soon, when more people will print the New York Times holding down the “print” button than buy a physical copy.

The original promise of the e-book was not a promise to the reader, it was a promise to the publisher: “We will design something that appears on a screen, but it will be as inconvenient as if it were a physical object.” This is the promise of the portable document format, where data goes to die, as well.

Institutions will try to preserve the problem for which they are the solution. Now publishers are in the business not of overcoming scarcity but of manufacturing demand. And that means that almost all innovation in creation, consumption, distribution and use of text is coming from outside the traditional publishing industry.

What is the future of reading? How can we make it more social?

One of the things that bugs me about the Kindle Fire is that for all that I didn’t like the original Kindle, one of its greatest features was that you couldn’t get your email on it. There was an old saying in the 1980s and 1990s that all applications expand to the point at which they can read email. An old geek text editor, eMacs, had added a capability to read email inside your text editor. Another sign of the end times, as if more were needed. In a way, this is happening with hardware. Everything that goes into your pocket expands until it can read email.

But a book is a “momentary stay against confusion.” This is something quoted approvingly by Nick Carr, the great scholar of digital confusion. The reading experience is so much more valuable now than it was ten years ago because it’s rarer. I remember, as a child, being bored. I grew up in a particularly boring place and so I was bored pretty frequently. But when the Internet came along it was like, “That’s it for being bored! Thank God! You’re awake at four in the morning? So are thousands of other people!”

Read More

Filed under Digital; Social; Clay Shirky; Reading

0 notes

John Keats on failure

"Don’t be discouraged by a failure (…). Failure is, in a sense, the highway to success, inasmuch as every discovery of what is false leads us to seek earnestly after what is true, and avery fresh experience points out some form of error which we shall afterwards carefully avoid." Je me rappelle avoir lu ce texte lors de mes années estudiantines. Sans faire le vieux cxx, ces mots prennent aujourd’hui un sens plus juste, plus substantiel. Reconnaître - au sens, double, que ce mot peut revêtir, soit : identifier d’une part, et admettre d’autre part - un échec lorsqu’on y est confronté est en effet l’effet de l’expérience, qui à son tour, comme le dit Keats, vient nourrir de ses bienfaits les succès à venir… 

Filed under succès échec citation Keats

1 note

(Re)découvrir Desproges

En ce début de vacances scolaires légèrement contrarié, j’ai revisité quelques uns des spectacles, sketches, interventions radiophoniques et télévisuelles de Pierre Desproges. Non content d’être spirituel, et vraiment drôle, le regretté Pierre faisait preuve de cette impertinence qui fait dire à tout un chacun : “ce ne serait plus possible aujourd’hui”. Juifs, arabes, Front National, invités de l’émission Champs Elysées : tout le monde y passe allègrement sans, semble-t-il, susciter les cris d’orfraie d’associations de défense de telle ou telle minorité, ou les référés si systématiques qu’ils en perdent leur caractère menaçant du FN nouveau de LP Jr. Je vous invite donc à (re)découvrir quelques citations (http://www.desproges.fr/citations), les nombreuses vidéos de spectacles, M. Cyclopède, le Tribunal des flagrants délires, les chroniques de la haine ordinaire… 

A près de 2 mois du 24ème anniversaire de sa mort (!), j’avais envie de partager ces moments de plaisir…

Filed under Desproges humour Pierre Desproges Cyclopède haine ordinaire

0 notes

Time to Tumblr

Tumblr est devenu un élément incontournable de la sphère digitale. Il lève les blocages de ceux qui veulent s’exprimer, n’ont guère le temps ou le talent de blogguer sur une plateforme traditionnelle, et ne se satisfont pas tout à fait de leurs posts Facebook ou Twitter. So, here I am, typique : beaucoup d’observations et de recommandation profesionnelle de Tumblr, mais pas d’utilisation active. Today’s the day… 

La probabilité que ce Tumblr soit peu actif est énorme. Celle qu’il ait une dimension professionnelle importante. Et toute l’excitation est bien là : un (petit) saut dans l’incertain…

A bientôt pour un billet plus substantiel !